General Electric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

General Electric - Essay ExampleUnder permiting Groups Group is a order of battle of 2 or more individuals, who interact regularly, exert mutual influence and work in tacit consent with each other to achieve a common determination (Griffin & Moorehead, 2008). Purpose of a group forms its mise en scene and the process by which this is achieved makes it operational. Team is structured, requires coordinated interaction to reach the set goal and all the members stand responsible for its activities. A congregation of individuals qualifies to be called a group based on Kurt Lewins parameters, which destine that the members should interact, are interdependent, influence each other, the members feel belongingness, have a structure, work towards a common goal and are recognised as a group by others. Task and relationship-based interactions develop in groups, through which people connect and affect each other. Group Development Bruce Tuckman suggested 4 stages of group development, which consist of forming, storming, norming and performing. Adjourning has been appended after (Griffin & Moorehead, 2008). a. Forming During this phase, individuals mingle with each other and communicate, in an attempt to arrive at their purpose of association. They assess their individual comfort zones. Leaders play a vital role in facilitating this understanding and walking them towards the future(a) stage (Griffin & Moorehead, 2008). In this phase, as we have come from different departments and educational backgrounds, we questioned each other on the relevant details. We have also discussed the past work experience and project records of each of the members. This has helped us in gaining an understanding on the capabilities of every individual of the teams. As a leader, I saw that the team discussions at this phase are directed towards exploring each other, being polite, keeping the communication alive and coordinating them. These conversations created an imagination on what would be the ideal roles for each of them within the team and we decided on them towards the end of the constitution meeting. b. Storming Here, the members share their views, assemble with others sharing similar thoughts and socialise. Leader persuades them to open up and streamlines their ideas, differences etc towards the group goals (Griffin & Moorehead, 2008). This phase has been the repugn one, as the group members started to interact, the differences started to surface. The resource sharing and competition led to substantial friction. However, as a skilled and experienced leader, I created the clarity on the jobs and responsibilities the scope of every person in the team is highlighted. Thus, the brilliance of every member and his role is clearly understood even by the others and thus, the decision making powers and extremity of the resources to each of them is discussed. Further, the common goals of the team and the focus on productivity of the team, which is only possible th rough the design efforts of all the teammates is stressed. I had to support the views of some of the members of the team during such communication, which has planted a doubt in them that I am favoring those members, which was cleared in the due course as the actual work turn up my support right. As the team members appreciate the roles and responsibili