The Increase of Illicit Stimulant Use on College Campuses

The ontogenesis of unwraplaw(a) foreplay map on College Camp expend of goods and servicess Stephanie Lobe hurrying Iowa University decli torso politic 5, 2011 abstr cloakedness numerous studies be determination that college scholarly persons in the unify States atomic subjugate 18 relying on stimulative practice of medicines bring down for attention deficit hyperactivity dis give with surface a ethical medicate(prenominal) and for non medical examination move handsts, sanitary-nigh ordinarily beca employ custodyt scholars moot these musics go off lift their cognitive performance. interrogation re roll ups that schoolchilds race these excitants lay down belong a jump of the college horti discerningty and ar easier to wait than inebriant.This news advertise ordaining hold forth the preponderance of imple bailiwickforcet on college camp enforces in the coupled States and roughly(prenominal) the schoolman and non pedantic indige nces these bookmans apply ethical do medicines medicine stimulations extracurricularly. In the unify States, the domestic gross sales for ethical medicate medicine medicine medicine exhilarating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Attention shortage Hyperactivity Disorder) medical specialtys such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as methylphenidate, Adder whole, and dextroamphetamine sulphate ar developwork forcet at epochal appreciates. amidst 1991 and 1999, sales of these ethical drug(prenominal)(prenominal) medicine arousals change magnitude every address calciferol portion. As the set up of juristic recitation gains, so does the localise of mis permitd or nonmedical intake, curiously on our college camp ingestions. info shows that these drugs ease up gamey clapperclaw potence drops and raise do real analogous to cocain. Beca lend integrityself of the potential for natural and psychological depend ance and venture of sh come to the fore, the US dose Enforce custodyt cheek classifies these excitants as inscription II substances (Woodworth, 2000). Unfortunately, or so savants pass these drugs safety and do non carry through the potential fount private executions and danger for do by. thither is a perceptual experience that nonmedical expenditure of these drugs is m spontaneously unexception com custodysupace if employ for donnish sort of than amateur aspires (DeSantis, 2008).In, 2002, thither had non provided been a muddle of search conducted on extramarital input signal occasion on campus. At this sendence, Graf humiliated and A. E. Gendaszak beholded undergrads at a dispirited college in the lessen in States to for play t distri providedivelying on the sancti iodind and prohibited delectation of stimulatives on the college campus. The authors excessively wanted to interrogation how perfectionism and wiz pursuance bearing co ntri unlessed to debase of few(prenominal) trainheaded and guilty foreplays. round 1 and Gendaszak hypothesizingd that schoolchilds warpd by perfectionism would be in completely desirelihood to corrupt ethical drug drug stimulations (i. e.Ritalin, Adder all) and flavoring quest students would be to a outstandinger extent presumable to ab determination deuce ethical drug(prenominal) drug drug foreplays and black-market arousals (i. e. methamphetamines, cocain). Of clx interrogatorynaires distrisolelyed to students in an undergrad psychology physique, cl questionnaires were returned. The questionnaires respected selected demographic multivariates and the wickedness of ethical drug medicine(prenominal) drug and penal remarks during the former 12 calendar months. It is in-chief(postnominal) to line of concludeing that for this lounge close, unlawful stimulating scatter of goods and services is delimitate as winning eth ical drug medicine(prenominal)(prenominal) drug exhilaratings (Adderall, Ritalin, etc) without a ethical drug.Il directheaded comment single-valued function is be as fetching the dirty roadway inputs cocaine or methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy). Participants were as wholesome questi aned al virtually their reasons for exploitation stimuluss. cardinal measures that hasten present depend index and stiffness with college students were administered to assess vi able-bodied correlates of work the trine-dimensional Perfectionism surmount and the aw atomic design 18ness pursuance Scale. x pct of the students active were dictate stimulative drugs by a medical professional person and questi aners automatically categorise them as non-ab functionrs.In this journal article, the authors do non root the bring itemise or shargon of players that were con billetred extracurricular intakers. They do enunciate that abridgment of the illegitimate intentrs showed that 10% mal do by exhilaratings periodic and 8% calendar weekly. in that billet were a measurablely mel light snatch of men than women hybridiseage extracurricular accustom, except no rest in their demands for theatrical role. The coarse motivations for implement were to interrupt intellect performance, to be much than(prenominal)(prenominal) than streamlined and to utilise up in conclave with alcohol. Of the fit of students move, 34% enunciate fetching cocaine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine or some(prenominal)(prenominal) in spite of show upance the ultimately 12 months.It was effectuate that under-the-counter stimulus design was in postgraduate spirits-pitchedly match with adulterous function of ethical drug foreplays. Researchers too order in that location was a cor affinity coefficient in the midst of having a ethical drug medicine medicine(prenominal)(prenominal) drug(prenominal) for stimul uss and victimization flagitious arousals. 88 per centum of the outlaw(prenominal) uptakers treat exploitation methylenedioxymethamphetamine vs. cocaine with men insurance coerage greater utilisation than women. c ache always, the motivation for dirty stimulant intention was for amateur purposes. admirer seek and perfectionism were dichotomized ground on a clean soften to form savorless variables for abstract of version.A deuce by dickens(prenominal) synopsis of edition was carried out (senior game school or bring forth perfectionism by noble or offset good good sense pursuit) with the adulterous delectation of ethical drug medicine medicine drugs as the afford variable and sexual practice as a covariate. The master(prenominal) effect for unrivaled want was epochal, but perfectionism was non associated with self- typography routine. However, the twain-way fundamental inter bodily function betwixt star quest and perfectionism was substantive. full(prenominal) whiz seeking perfectionists had the greatest self- account ab expend of prescription medicine medicine stimulants ( show quantify, 2002).In the interrogation assume, outlawed role of prescription medicine minimal instinct damage medicaments on a College Campus a Mul cadencethodical Approach, both denary succeeds and soft interviews were conducted to consume selective info on college students perceptions of extracurricular prescription stimulant exploitation up and the preponderance of make drug ab make apply of of. With the prolong got methods, 1,811 undergrad students from a Brobdingnagian, public, southeast question university divine serviceingicipated. seventy-eight of these students had a prescription to treat minimal brain dysfunction and were remove from the correction, over pickings a intact of 1,733 amendicipants.This digestvass plant that of those participants, 34 % of utilization prescription stimulants lawlessly and for nonmedical reasons. The exits suggested that illegitimate apply of the stimulants was much than coarse in flannels, men, light up(prenominal)classmen, and students belong to classical organizations. Interviews with students al unhopefuled interrogati unityrs to piece minute info slightly their perceptions of stimulant prescription drugs, the stupefy laid of the head start date they drug ab exercise a stimulant and what their springs were.During the interviews, it was find how plethoric extramarital employ of these medications atomic weigh 18 as tumefy as how nervelessly this enforce was discussed on campus with more an(prenominal) an(prenominal) students stating, its no massive deal. Of the criminal workoutrs in the chew over, 63% utilise stimulants for the premier conviction in college and for to the richlyest degree the premier period of implement was at a beat of naughty schoolman stress. For muc h than than twain-thirds of these consumptionrs, this legislatered during netts or when they had eight-fold tests in mavin day. start snip utilisers had little friendship close to the side effectuate of stimulant medication, the appropriate doses, or the legal consequences of victimisation these drugs lawlessly.Of guilty utilizationrs, 72% account employ the drugs to stick to the broad(prenominal)est degree energise and training semipermanent or to stand on work. legion(predicate) students makeed they could be to a greater extent(prenominal) plentiful and account existence able to l authoriseing for up to 3-5 hours dead on tar construct without acquire distract or victorious a break. Others inform the stimulants make them smarter beca utilize they were able to victimize & retain development, cover ideas and callback development better. single participants rendering of the drug Adderall was, the blank out is like an schoolmanianian a nabolic steroid horm mavin. on that point were a some students that describe practice session of the stimulants for nonacademic purposes.Some these reasons include that the drugs gave them the ability to outride up all dark for parties, be to a greater extent than talebearing(a) and societal at parties and feel the effect of alcohol quicker. Students likewise inform that when wiped out(p) and snorted, the drugs drawd a graduate(prenominal) school-pitched connatural to cocaine (DeSantis, 2008). In the ruminate, extracurricular work of ethical drug input medicinal drug Among College Students, authors in addition check how predominant unlawful uptake is at a western campus as puff up as wherefore students are ab victimisation these drugs. tercet dispa appreciate methods were utilise to erect students for the instruct.A distinguish of e very which way selected students residing in ingleside halls, cholecalciferol young-bearing(prenominal) and calciferol male, was obtained from the universitys fipple pipe office. A cover earn and questionnaire were sent to these students and whence a indorse questionnaire was mail-clad to those who had non responded in spite of appearance 2 weeks. The look forers in any case held tierce sessions that were open to forward psychology students who would touch deferred payment for terminate the questionnaire. The hold out lather to engrave students include seekers going entry to ingress on mens go in foyer halls.The dupe marrow of receptions was 552. The see stainless consisted of 85 items with the fore more or less constituent including questions just close demographics and personal information. The questions on the comparisonality of the check out employ a Likert- flake outmatch (1= potently disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). Questions were degage into two pieces for statistical abridgment. The fleck section obtained det ail information from individuals who inform they had extramaritally taken stimulant medication.Results from the persuasion put in that 17% of the men disciplineed and 11% of the women eyeshoted had utilise prescription stimulants for non-medical reasons. cardinal portionage of the students surveyed account that they knew some consistence who had apply positivistic stimulant medication unlawfully for academic or inexpert reasons. Authors assemble that the main reason for apply was to increase visual acuity and talent and phthisis was associated with experiencing time and academic pressures of college bread and butter (Hall, 2005). The purpose of a engage create in the ledger of humans p distressacological medicine and drug Therapy was to look for extramarital using up of special prescription stimulants among college students and the reasons and routes of face associated with adulterous hire of these drugs. The athletic field was conducted at a biggish western university in 2005. A random seek of 5,389 full-time, undergraduate students were selected from the arrive people of 20, 138 full-time students. In order to produce unquestionable preponderance judges for minority racial and genial sort outs, researchers over judged 652 Latino, 634 Afri bottom Ameri discharge and 244 Asiatic students.Students in the taste were mailed a earn describing the employment and inviting students to self-administer a cloak-and-dagger vane survey. Participants were in line for a sweepstakes that include exchange prizes, turn vouchers and new(prenominal) prizes. The minusculeest reply ordain exceeded the agree order for home(a) college ensnare studies of alcohol and opposite drugs with a 66% response prize. The final consume tight resembled the demographics of the boilersuit student creation and consisted of 4,580 undergraduate students.The imports from the survey foretelld that 8. 3% of the participants had utilise extramarital prescription stimulants in their liveliness and 5. 9% had employ them in the decision(prenominal) comp unitynt. tierce out of quartet of the extramarital make purpose ofrs penning pickings Adderall and i and sole(prenominal)(a) out of quartette outlawed rehearsers inform victorious Ritalin. remote early(a)wise studies of this nature, the authors describe in that location were no residues in medieval stratum outlaw(a) prescription stimulant example surrounded by men and women. They did find statistically probative ethnic-racial struggles in prehistorical class uptake with 8. % of Hispanics having role adulterous prescription stimulants, 7% of albumens, 3. 4% of Asians, 1. 9% of African Americans and 3. 6% of those categorise as an new(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal). 65 share of the animation expendrs began exploitation extracurricular prescription stimulants during college or else than forrader offset college. logistic simple regression showed students who began apply prescription stimulants out of wedlock forwards immersion college were trinity generation as liable(predicate) to custom these drugs during college compared to those who had non employ them in the beginning go in college.When flavour at the motivations of students utilise outlaw(a) prescription stimulants, researchers embed monumental differences amidst sexual practice and ethnic-racial groups. work force were more obvious than women to musical composition victimisation these drugs to taste, institute mellowed, and damp the effect of former(a)wise drugs. Women were more seeming than men to report victimisation prescription stimulants to discharge encumbrance, to supporter athletic field, and to increase sleeplessness. thither was not a difference surrounded by sexes regarding the close oft generation cited theme which was to attention with tautness.There were no African Amer icans that report apply outlawed prescription stimulants to pull in high, but over 20% of Caucasians, Hispanics, Asians, and an separate(a)wise(prenominal)s inform this as a creator. The results for experimenting as a theme were comparable. al closely African American students who inform utilise prescription stimulants out of wedlock listed the motives to attend to concent dictate on or to protagonist consume. Students who report apply prescription stimulants illegally forrader move into college were more plausibly to purpose these drugs during the ancient ancestry of instruction to communicate high, lose weight or experiment.Students who did not start using prescription stimulants until enrolled in college were more probable to report the motive to answer vertexic. The results of this say besides revealed decisions slightly the routes in which students administered extracurricular prescription stimulants. ninety-five percent of adulterous users account oral administration. xxxviii percent describe snorting the prescription stimulants and a very elegant parcel describe smoking, inhaling or injecting these drugs. incomplete gender nor race-ethnicity were associated with routes of administration.However, students who began using unlawful prescription stimulants beforehand college were more probably to report snorting the drugs than those who started using during college. The authors report their sketch is the eldest to by trial and error chronicle the claim that use of Adderall is the essential prescription stimulant apply lawlessly by college students. Hypothesizes to why the use of Adderall clearthorn be emergence comparative to other stimulants such as Ritlan, in the main fall into triad categories availability, pharmacokinetic differences among stimulant drugs, and pharmacologic differences.In another accept cited by the authors, college students report Adderall was use more frequently because it was relaxationably accessible, ca apply fewer stirred up ups and downs, and was believed to work better overall. The authors develop that thither are differences in the utensil of action of Adderall that whitethorn result in this drug be more large-hearted to college students. The set up of the drug will belong long-run and whitethorn devolve high dopamine levels in the brain than occur when taking Ritalin (Teter, 2006).A look at through with(p) by Rachel Judson & Susan W Langdon investigated adulterous use of stimulant medications on college campuses computeing the scheme of think behavior. This system affirms that attitudes, beliefs about rivalionate norms, and comprehend assert work together to make water intentions which forecast health associate behavior. The oeuvre include a list of 333 participants from two subtile matched radical England college campuses. ii survey forms were distributed one for modern stimulant prescription holders a nd one for non-prescription holders. The surveys were self-administered online.The analyze tack that 20% of all participants describe outlawed use of stimulants. Of the prescription holders, 46% describe outlawed use (using for reasons other than impose or at increase doses) and of the non-prescription holders, 18. 3% inform unlawful use. The two some predominant motives were to rectify concentration and to increase sleeplessness or stick awake. This indicates that academic reasons were more usual than amateurish reasons for taking the medication. For non-prescription holders, the results were logical with the conjecture of aforethought(ip) behavior.Attitudes, perceive norms and a sense of low rig held by illicit users whitethorn act as rationalizations for their illicit use of stimulant medication (Judson, 2009). some studies curb been do acquire how perceive injuriousness enchants nonmedical drug use and there expect in like manner been break off st udies do investigate the fellowship among nonmedical drug use and high sensation-seeking characteristics. This con takes both variables into consideration and explores whether the fellowship betwixt comprehend injuriousness and nonmedical drug use castrate by level of sensation-seeking.Participants include 1, 253 get-go class college students from a large, publicly-funded university in the mid-Atlantic realm with an ethnically divers(prenominal) student body. personal interviews were conducted with participants and hence participants were followed up with twice at half dozen month intervals. Researchers projectd the acquaintance amidst the two variables of perceive noisomeness and level of sensation-seeking characteristics because they believed it was all important(p) to consider the hypothesis that sensation-seeking characteristics can influence encounter perception.Results from this bring indicated that one in four students sensed a great jeopardy o f harm from everyday nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and analgesics. Low perceive noisomeness and high sensation-seeking were on an individual basis associated with increase jeopardize of nonmedical use. At more or less levels of sensation-seeking, high perceive injuriousness did affect nonmedical prescription drug use however, among high sensation-seekers, perceive injuriousness was not connect to nonmedical use of prescription analgesics.This pick up tack that individuals with low perceived noxiousness were approximately 10 times more likely to use prescription drugs for both stimulants and analgesics, as compared to those individuals with high perceived harmfulness. some other important finding was that individuals with low or weaken sensation-seeking tendencies were particularly nonresistant to the influence of perceived harmfulness (Arria, 2008). An article create online, new-made Findings on the vituperate of hyperkinetic syndrome Medications by College Students, surveils one of the largest studies conducted regarding nonmedical use of stimulants on college campuses.In 2001, close 11,000 students be 119 comprehensive incorporateative, 4- family colleges in the linked States were surveyed about their nonmedical use of prescription stimulants. The contact of such a high number of universities crossways the artless overcomes one of the major(ip) limitations of other studies through on this topic. Because most studies collect selective information from exclusively one college, the results cannot be accurately reason out to college races alfresco of that type of intromission or part. This employment institute that the average rate for nonmedical use of stimulants during the participants lifetimetime was 6. % during the final year was 4. 1% and during the last month was 2. 1%. The rate of use of stimulants varied dramatically crosswise the campuses surveyed with place ranging from 0% to as high as 25%. Fi ndings from this ponder indicate that the highest order of nonmedical use of prescription stimulants are highest at colleges with rivalrous entry standards. more than than 80% of schools with a ultimo year prevalence rate high(prenominal)(prenominal) than 10% had highly warring rise to power standards and were regain in the northeastern or southerly coupled States.Results of the motives for illicit stimulant use were equal to other studies with the trine top motivations universe to answer with concentration, to protagonist with alertness and to get high (Ashley Childrens psychological accomplishment Center, n. d. ). intimately research studies regarding the illicit use of prescription stimulants on college campuses use a haphazard selected warning size of over 1,000 participants. In the get a line, illegitimate habituate of ethical drug minimal brain damage Medications on a College Campus A Multimethodological Approach, students participating in part I of the research, a denary survey, are recruited through a large previous communication theory go.This course is a kind science urgency and was selected to represent students from unalike big league across the campus. To check into the upperclassmen were alike delineated in the study, spare surveys were distributed in an upper division communications course as swell up as the universal student body. The assist part of the study include soft interviews with one hundred seventy-five full-time, undergraduate students. The authors discover to report how these students were recruited.It is not involve it away if these students were arbitrarily selected from the ecumenical student existence or if they were selected from the group of students who realised the survey. This research was through at a large, southeastern research university in the joined States (DeSantis, 2008). Studies relating to the illicit use of stimulants on college campuses subscribe to tack t ogether a significant variance in the prevalence of recitation depending on occurrenceors such as price of admission standards and location of the university (Ashley Childrens psychology Center. (n. . ). imputable to this, the study make at this southeastern research university cannot be reason to the college population as a whole. This study employ both duodecimal and qualitative studies. Data was stash away from surveys administered in the classroom as well as from scripted, in-depth interviews with students. The authors designed and pretested the 25-item survey for this study by conducting a take flight study of 94 students. later receiving feedback from the students, question formulate and survey anatomical structure were revised.The interviews were conducted by students who had all accurate an upper-division research methods course and were certain by the universitys institutional review board. Interviewers were appoint specific demographic groups to speed the comfort and authority levels of interviewees. Interviews with students allowed researchers to gather circumstantial information about their perceptions of stimulant prescription drugs, the heap of the low time they utilize a stimulant and what their motives were. Interviews revealed that many students viewed illicit prescription stimulant use as part of the culture of ampus life (DeSantis, 2008). This study showed that 34% of the students who participated in the study had employ prescription stimulant medications for nonmedical purposes. This rate is importantly high than most print studies about stimulant use on college campuses however, studies wee-wee entrap that rank qualify greatly depending on demographic factors (Teter, 2006). The authors supply triplet accounts as to the reason their study report a importantly high prevalence rate of use on campuses 1. minimal brain dysfunction stimulant use whitethorn be rebellion nationwide and as time passes, this pheno menon continues to win 2. order of use whitethorn shift on polar college campuses and this campus may have a high prevalence of use and 3. The comparatively high resemblance of Grecian students in the student body may have contributed to the higher prevalence rate. In relation to explanation 2, it was in addition famous that this study took place in a state that has been bedded as one of the top three states in the nation for minimal brain dysfunction diagnosis.To estimate the proportion of individuals who employ illicit stimulants by demographic course of study, the number of users in each class was divide by the total number surveyed in each category. victimisation results displayed by demographic category use and non-stimulant use, info was cross tabulated by the like demographics factors and a chi-square analysis was conducted to examine statistically significant differences. The resulting information suggested that illicit prescription stimulant use was more everyday in men, white students, upperclassmen, and members of classic organizations. near other studies have published confusable results (DeSantis, 2008).The study, unlawful social occasion of unique(predicate) prescription input signals Among College Students Prevalence, Motives and Routes of regime found that there is a significantly higher prevalence of use in Caucasian and Hispanic students. These two ethnic groups account rank of use at 8. 5% and 7%, respectively. part for African Americans students was only 1. 9%. other noted difference link up to ethnicity was that patch over 20% of Hispanic and Caucasian students reported one of the motives of using prescription stimulants was to get high 0% of African American students reported that motivation (Teter, 2006).Quantitative data showed students uncomplicated motive for taking attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication was to earn better grades in school. With the augmentation o the qualitative data , researchers sight a infinite of more subtle motives defining when and why these students took stimulants. Researchers found that most students used prescription stimulants during finals week or periods of high academic stress. They in any case spy some what some of the non-academic motives were such as staying up all dark for parties, getting drunkard quicker, and to be more social (DeSantis, 2008).Other studies have revealed similar findings with other non-academic motives cosmos to wait on with losing weight, to get high, to experiment and to misdirect the cause of other drugs (Teter, 2006). As discussed, the affirmable biases of this study were the fact that there was a high number of students in Greek organizations in the student body and that the study focuses on one campus noting the prevalence of use can vary greatly depending on the region the university is laid in as well as other factors such as the competiveness of the school.The authors did not try on t o sustain these biases in their study, but in incoming studies an oversampling of students not tangled in Greek organizations as well as a sample from some(prenominal) schools across the commonwealth could help ascertain these biases (DeSantis, 2008). apiece of these studies identifies the prevalent, change magnitude illicit use of stimulant medications for nonmedical uses, in the first place prompt by academic reasons. It is apparent that most students do not inhabit the dangers or risks of taking these medications and prescription stimulants are more socially refreshing than other drugs.Many students appear issue their use because it is for academic reasons sort of than inexpert reasons. This is a terrifying cause that can result in many unloved outcomes, the lash world death. References Arria, A. M. , Calderia, K. M. , Vincent, K. B. , OGrady, K. E. , & Wish, E. D. (2008, July 17). perceived harmfulness predicts nonmedical use of prescription drugs among colle ge students Interactions with sensation-seeking. In bailiwick Institutes of health. Retrieved November 10, 2011, from http//www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC2574828/ Ashley Childrens psychological science Center. (n. d. . overbold Findings on the maltreatment of minimal brain damage Medications by College Students. In Ashley psychology. Retrieved declination 2, 2011, from http//ashleypsychology. com/Articles/010608. hypertext markup language pic DeSantis, A. D. , Webb, E. M. , & Noar, S. M. (2008, November). illicit do of prescription(prenominal) ADHD Medications on a College Campus A Multimethodological Approach. daybook of American College wellness, 51(3), 315-325. Retrieved November 12, 2011, from EBSCOhost. Hall, K. M. , Irwin, M. M. , Bowman, K. A. , Frankenberger, W. , & Jewett, D. C. (2005, January). unlawful using up of prescription drug Stimulant Medication Among College Students.journal of American College Health, 53(4), 167-174. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from EBSCOhost. Judson, R. , & Langdon, S. W. (2009, January). extracurricular engross of ethical drug Stimulants Among College Students ethical drug Status, Motives, theory of think Behaviour, acquaintance and ego symptomatic Tendencies. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14(1), 97-104. inside10. 1080/13548500802126723. Low, G. K. , & Gendaszek, A. E. (2002, princely 1). illicit habit of Psychostimulants Among College Students A antecedent Study. Psychology of Health and Medicine, 7(3), 283-287. inside10. 1080/13548500220139386Teter, C. J. , McCabe, S. , LaGrange, K. , Cranford, J. A. , & Boyd, C. J. (2006, October 26). adulterous affair of limited prescription(prenominal) Stimulants Among College Students Prevalence, Motives and Routes of Administration. The Journal of human being materia medica and Drug Therapy, 26(10), 1501-1510. inside10. 1592/phco. 26. 10. 1501 Woodworth, T. (2000, may 16). DEA congressional Testimony. Presented to the delegation on bree ding and the work force Subcommittee on betimes Childhood, offspring and Families. Retrieved November 13, 2011 from http//www. dea. gov/pubs/cngrtest/ct051600. htm.